• 0974-4274(PRINT), ISSN NO: 2582-1148(ONLINE)
2

Archive Details

Help Desk

Year 2014 50 Downloads
Volume/Issue/Review Month Vol. - VII | Issue I | January - June
Title Web 2.0 Tools: A Millennium Tools for Knowledge Sharing in B-schools
Authors Karishma Gulati , Dr. Neeru Mundra , Karan Trehan
Broad area Web 2.0 Tools: A Millennium Tools for Knowledge Sharing in B-schools
Abstract
The Web 2.0 applications hold weighty potential in education sector because these are open in nature, easy in use
and supports effectual association and communication. They change the conventional outlook of human knowledge
and unlock more chances in teaching and learning. Now-a-days, countless teachers are exploring the utilization of
Web 2.0 tools into teaching and learning. On the other hand, it will not be dubious to say that studies of teacher’s
perceptions and opinions are critical because they are momentous to the realization of technology innovations. The
present study aimed to investigate teachers’ use and perceptions of Web 2.0 technologies in teaching and learning.
It is anticipated that the result of this study will be endowed with practical information that enables the management
faculty to better understand the importance of Web 2.0 tools with teachers and student’s use and perceptions of
Web 2.0 technologies in teaching and learning. The present paper investigates teachers and student’s familiarity with
web 2.0 concepts, tools and services and applications related to learning. Management education, is meeting a dual
challenge in the rate of acceptance of technology by their faculty and the quick speed of advancement, producing
a unique set of challenges.
DOI Knowledge is one of the most important strategic assets for new generation organization. There is a considerable amount of tacit knowledge which the employees hold, acts as a competitive advantage to the organization. It is a very important study organiza
File
Referenceses
  • 1. Abrams, L.C., Cross, R., Lesser, E. and Levin, D.Z.
  • (2003), ‘‘Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledgesharing
  • networks’’, Academy of Management
  • Executive, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 64-77.
  • 2. Anderson, P. (2007), ‘‘What is Web 2.0? Ideas,
  • technologies and implications for education’’, JISC
  • Technology & Standards Watch, available at:
  • www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/
  • tsw0701b. pdf (accessed 10 March 2009).
  • 3. Alexander, B. (2006), “Web 2.0: a new wave of
  • innovation for teaching and learning”, EDUCAUSE
  • Review, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 32-44.
  • 4. Christina Matschke, Johannes Moskaliuk, Ulrike
  • Cress, Journal of Knowledge Management Emerald
  • Article: Knowledge exchange using Web 2.0
  • technologies in NGOs, VOL. 16 NO. 1 2012, pp.
  • 159-176, Q Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN
  • 1367-3270.
  • 5. Cress, U., Kimmerle, J. and Hesse, F.W. (2006),
  • ‘‘The information-exchange with shared databases
  • as a social dilemma – the effects of metaknowledge,
  • bonus systems, and costs’’, Communication
  • Research, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 370-90.
  • 6. Edwards, M. (1997), ‘‘Organizational learning in nongovernmental
  • organizations: what have we
  • learned?’’, Public Administration and Development,
  • Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 235-50.
  • 7. Emory M. Craig ,Campus-Wide Information Systems
  • Emerald Article: Changing paradigms: managed
  • learning environments and Web 2.0, Vol. 24 No. 3,
  • 2007 pp. 152-161 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • 8. Elliot, B. (2007), “E-assessment: what is Web
  • 2.0?”,available at: www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/22941.html.
  • 9. Farmer, J. (2006), “When digital dodos meet digital
  • natives: the emerging redemption of online
  • education”, forthcoming conference on Internet
  • Research 7.0: Internet Convergences,
  • Brisbane, Australia, available at: http://conferences.
  • aoir.org/viewabstract.php.
  • 10. Fahri Karakas, Welcome to World 2.0: the new
  • digital ecosystem, Journal of Business Strategy
  • Emerald Article, VOL. 30 NO. 4 2009, pp. 23-30, Q
  • Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 0275-6668
  • 11. Liana Razmerita, Kathrin Kirchner, Frantisek
  • Sudzina, Personal knowledge management: The role
  • of Web 2.0 tools for managing knowledge at individual
  • and organisational levels, Vol. 33 No. 6, 2009,pp.
  • 1021-1039 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • 12. Ricardo Colomo-Palacios, Web 2.0: new and
  • challenging practical issues,Emerald Article.
  • 13. Sotirios Paroutis, Alya Al Saleh, Journal of Knowledge
  • Management Emerald Article: Determinants of
  • knowledge sharing using Web 2.0 technologies,
  • VOL. 13 NO. 4 2009, pp. 52-63, Q Emerald Group
  • Publishing Limited, ISSN 1367-3270.
  • 14. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. (1986), ‘‘The social identity
  • theory of intergroup behavior’’, in Worchel, S. and
  • Austin, W.G. (Eds), Psychology of Intergroup
  • Relations, 2nd Ed., Nelson-Hall Publishers, Chicago,
  • IL, pp. 7-24.
  • 15. Wodzicki, K., Moskaliuk, J. and Cress, U. (2011),
  • ‘‘Patterns for social practices: a psychological
  • perspective’’, in Kohls, C. and Wedekind, J. (Eds),
  • Investigations of E-learning Patterns: Context
  • Factors, Problems and Solutions, IGI Global,
  • Hershey, PA, pp. 257-71.