| Year | 2016 50 Downloads |
| Volume/Issue/Review Month | Vol. - IX | Issue II | July - December |
| Title | Information Content of Economic Value Added: Evidence from Indian Banking Industry |
| Authors | Munmun Mohanty , Sanjib Pattnaik |
| Broad area | Information Content of Economic Value Added: Evidence from Indian Banking Industry |
| Abstract | Many studies have been conducted in the last two decades to answer questions such as whether it is really better to use modern value based measures than the traditional performance measures to gauge corporate financial performance, or which performance measure best explains corporations’ change in market value. While there have been quite a few successful EVA stories are to encourage the EVA users, evidence supporting the rhetoric has been primarily anecdotal. There has not been sufficient empirical research to substantiate the claim that EVA is the best performance measure in terms of value relevance. This study is basically motivated by the claims cited above including the interest in EVA in the business press, increasing use of EVA by firms, increasing interest in EVA among academics and potential interest in EVA among accounting policy makers. We have tried to provide independent empirical evidence on the information content of EVA and two mandated performance measures like earnings and operating cash flow. The first part of analysis uses pooled time series, cross sectional data of 34 listed Indian Banks during the period 2—1-2010 to evaluate the usefulness of EVA and other accounting based performance measures. The relative information content indicate that over this period EVA explains some 27 per cent of variation in stock return which is the maximum compared with the other mandated performance measures in our study. Notwithstanding the obvious importance of earnings figures in value relevance studies, EVA is significant at the margin in explaining variation in stock returns. This would support the potential usefulness of EVA type measures for internal and external performance measures. In the second part of the analysis, the components of EVA are specified as explanatory variables in regression with excess returns. When examining components of EVA (which are shared with closely related performance measures) the after tax interest was found to be the most significant component in explaining stock returns. This was followed by CFO and accruals respectively. However, the capital charge was found to have the least information content. |
| DOI | There has been increasing interest of shareholders monitoring the performance of companies where they have invested their money. This issue has resulted in the creation of a culture related to shareholder wealth, where shareholders do not conform to, inve |
| File | |
| Referenceses | w Ali, A. & Pope, P.F. 1995, ‘The incremental information content of earnings, funds flow and cash flow: The UK evidence’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 19–34. w Anonymous, 1993, ‘The real key to creating wealth’, Fortune, vol. 128, no. 6, pp. 38–43. w Bao, B-H. & Bao, D-H. 1998, ‘Usefulness of value added and abnormal economic earnings: An empirical examination’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 25, no. 1–2, pp. 251–65. w Bacidore, J., Boquist, J., Milbourn, T. and Thakor, A. (1997) The search for the best financial performance measure. Financial Analysts Journal 53: 11–20. w Biddle, G., Seow, G., 1991, “The estimation and determinants of association between returns and earnings: Evidence from cross industry comparisons”, Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance, 6, 183-232 w Biddle, G., Seow, G., Siegel, A.1995, “Relative Versus Incremental Information Content”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 12, 1-23 w Biddle, G. C., Bowen, M. R. & Wallace, J.S. (1999). Evidence on EVA. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12(2), 69-79. w Bowen, R.M., Burgstahler, D. & Daley, L.A. 1987, ‘The incremental information content of accrual versus cash flows’, The Accounting Review, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 723–47. w Chenn, S., and Dodd, J.L., 1997, “Economic Value Added (EVA): An Empirical Examination of a New Corporate Performance Measure”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 9, 318-33 w Chenn, S., and Dodd, J.L., 2001, “Operating Income, Residual Income and EVA: Which Metric is More Relevant?”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 65-86 w Drucker, P. 1991, ‘The new productivity challenge’, Harvard Business Review, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 69–79. w Easton, P.D. & Harris, T.S. 1991, ‘Earnings as an explanatory variable for returns’, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 19–36. w Ehrbar, A. (1998), Economic Value Added: The Real Key to Creating Wealth, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. w Erasmus, P.D. (2008), “The Relative and Incremental Information Content of the Value Based Financial Performance Measure Cash Value Added (CVA)”, Management Dynamics, Vol.17, No. 1, pp.2-15. |