| Year | 2016 50 Downloads |
| Volume/Issue/Review Month | Vol. - IX | Issue I | January - June |
| Title | A Study on Perception of Customers and Bankers towards Service Quality in Public Sector Banks in Odisha |
| Authors | Kalpana Panigrahi , Bidhu Bhusan Mishra |
| Broad area | A Study on Perception of Customers and Bankers towards Service Quality in Public Sector Banks in Odisha |
| Abstract | Banks are facing increased competition due to globalization, technological advancement and consumer awareness about their rights.This phenomenon has put the banks to rethink and revise the service quality, especially in the growth and development of service sector. Service quality is an important factor that affects organizational performance and success.Ultimate survival of the bankin a competitive world depends on high quality service it offers to its customers. This also increases customer satisfaction and loyalty and customer satisfaction can effects customer’s future intentions to remain with the bank.Servicequality was also found to be the basic factor that affects customers’ satisfaction and customers are the most important stakeholders in any industry.Service Quality is a buzz word to the banks to sustain in the competitive environment.Numerous studies were conducted word-wide to identify the determinants of service quality and customersatisfaction by using different instruments likeSERVQUAL and modified SERVQUAL. Few studies wereconducted in India to understand the gap between the customers’ and bankers’ perception towards service quality offered by Banks. The main purpose of the studywas to examine the customers’ and managers’perception towards service quality of Banks. Here SERVQUAL has been used with little modification because to fit to the modern banking industry for which it is being used. Hence,the parameters used in this study for customer survey are tangibility, assurance, reliability, responsiveness, empathy alongwith e- Banking. |
| DOI | Now with the overgrowing rise of economy in India, the banking system should not only be hassle freebut it should also be competitive to meet the new challenges posed by the technology and other environmental (both external andinternal) factors.The compet |
| File | |
| Referenceses | 1. Atkins, C. R., Dykes, P., Hagerty, J., &Hoye, J. (2002); “How customer performance partnerships can sharpen your competitive edge” The Journal for Quality and Participation, 25(3), 22-25. 2. Beaujean, M.; Cremers, V.; Pereira, F. P. G. (2005); “How Europe’s banks can profit from loyal customers” https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/ How_Europes_banks_can_profit_from_loyal_ customers_1703 3. Beaujean, M.; Davidson, J.; Madge, S. (2006); “The Moment of Truth in Customer Service”, https:// www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_moment_of_truth _in_customer_service_1728 4. Bettencourt, Lance A., and Kevin G. (1996); “Customisation of the Service Experience: The Role 60 Srusti Management Review, Vol -IX, Issue - I, January- June 2016 of the Frontline Employee”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 7 (2), 3 -20. 5. Bitner, MJ, Booms, BH &Tetreault, MS (1990); “The service encounter: diagnosing favourable and unfavourable incidents”, Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 71-84. 6. Buttle, F. (1996); “SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda”, European Journal of Marketing, 30 (1), 8-32. 7. Chandon, Jean L., Pierre.Y Leo, and Jean P. (1997); “Service Encounter Dimensions – A Dyadic Perspective: Measuring the Dimensions of Service Encounters as perceived by Customers and Personnel”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8 (1), 65-86. 8. Chiang, F.F.T., &Birtch, T. A. (2011); “Reward climate and its impact on service quality orientation and employee Attitudes”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30, 3–9. 9. Coveney, M.; Ganster, D.; Hartlen, B.; King, D. (2003); “The Strategy Gap: Leveraging Technology to Execute Winning Strategies”, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 232 p. 10. Cronin Jr, J & Taylor, S. A. (1994); “SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance” Journal of Marketing, 40 (1) |