| Year | 2017 50 Downloads |
| Volume/Issue/Review Month | Vol. - X | Issue I | January - June |
| Title | A Study on Economic Dimensions of India and China |
| Authors | Sunil Kumar Das , Tushar Kanta Pany |
| Broad area | A Study on Economic Dimensions of India and China |
| Abstract | India and China are the two emerging economies of the world. They are the two most populous countries in the world who together account for more than a third of the world’s total population. A descriptive research study has been carried out for investigating the Gross Domestic Product of India and China in nominal and purchasing power parity basis. It also compares per capita gross domestic product and GDP growth rate of India and China. It also investigates the trends in the value of Chinese Yuan Renminbi (CNY) with Indian Rupee (INR). This paper also exhibits the market share in Foreign Direct Investment in Asia Pacific region in 2015. The dramatic rise not only enabled socioeconomic upsurge of India and China but it also reshaped the regional and global trade trends. India replaced China as leading recipient of capital investment in Asia-Pacific with announced FDI of $63bn, as well as an 8 per cent increase in project numbers to 697. India faced various structural bottlenecks including delays in project approval, ill-targeted subsidies, a low manufacturing base and low agricultural productivity, difficulty in land acquisition, weak transportation and power networks, strict labour regulations and skill mismatches. |
| DOI | Indo-China relations refer to international relations between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of India. The economic and diplomatic importance of India and China, which are the two most populous states and the world’s fastest gro |
| File | |
| Referenceses | w Baharumshah, A., & Thanoon, M. (2006). Foreign capital flows and economic growth in EastAsian countries. China Economic Review,17, 70-83 w Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1996). Multinationals, Linkages, and Economic Development. American Economic Review, 86, 852-873 w Blomstrom, M., and Kokko A. (1998). Multinational Corporations and Spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 247 w Bose, T.K., (2012). Advantages and disadvantages of FDI in China and India, International Business Research, Vol. 5, No. 5; May 2012, 164-174 w Chadee and Schlichting. (1997). Foreign Direct Investment in the Asia-Pacific Region: Overview of Recent Trends and Patterns. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 9, 3-15 w Chakraborty, C., & Basu, P. (2002). Foreign direct investment and growth in India: A cointegration approach. Applied Economics, 34, 1061–1073 w Chung, W. (2001). Mode, size, and location of foreign direct investments and industry markups. Journal of Economic & Organisation, 45, 185-211 w Corensztein, Greorio, De and Lee. (1998). How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Growth?. Journal of International Economics, 45, 115-135 w Dunning, J. H. (2002). Determinants of foreign direct investment: Globalisation induced changes and the role of FDI policies. World Investment Prospects, Economist Intelligence Unit, pp 1-15 w Hansen and Rand. (2006). On the Causal Links Between FDI and Growth in Developing Countries. The World Economy, 29, 21-42 w Hsiao and Shen. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: The Importance of Institutions and Urbanization. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51, 83-896 w Karimi, M., & Yusop, Z. (2009). FDI and Economic Growth in Malaysia. MPRA, Paper no. 14999 w Lee. (2005). Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Trade Liberalization: A Viable Answer for Economic Development?. Journal of World Trade, 39, 701-717 w Li and Liu. (2004). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: An Increasingly Endogenous Relationship. World Development, 33, 393-407 w Merican, Y. (2009). Foreign Direct Investment and Growth in ASEAN-4 Nations. International Journal of Business and Management, 4, 6 w Ogutcu, M. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment and Regional Development: Sharing experiences from Brazil, China, Russia and Turkey. OECD Paper, Paris |