| Year | 2009 50 Downloads |
| Volume/Issue/Review Month | Vol. - 2 | Issue 1 | January – June |
| Title | Firm Size as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Business Strategy and Performance in Indian Automotive Industry |
| Authors | M. Kannadhasan , Dr. R. Nandagopal |
| Broad area | Business Strategy and Performance in Indian Automotive Industry |
| Abstract | Miles and Snow’s strategy typologies have been widely employed to describe various business strategies within a given industry and its relationship with performance as well. Numerous empirical studies have been conducted in abroad on strategy– performance relationship, while little attention has been focused on the moderating effect of size of the firm on the strategy and performance relationship. No research has been carried out on this topic related to Indian automotive industry. This study explicitly investigates the effect of firm size in moderating the relationship between strategy and performance of automotive companies in India. Findings are drawn from the analysis of the primary data collected from CFOs representing 18 automotive companies operating in India and secondary data collected from CMIE, Prowess data bases. |
| DOI | Today’s business is characterised by complex nature which drives the companies to practice some form of strategic management to formulate and implement strategies in order to be successful in this globally competitive and rapidly changing business envir |
| File | |
| Referenceses | 1. Miles R E and Snow C C (), “Organisational Strategy, Structure and Process”, New York, NY-McGraw Hills, 1978 2. Por ter, Michael E.. Competitive Strategy, New York: The Free Press, 1980 3. Aragon Antonio –Sanchez and Gregorio Sanchez-Martin, “Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics and Performance: a study of Spanish SMEs”, Journal of Small Business Management, 2005, Vol.43, No.3, pp 287-308. 4. Kumar Ashish and Shah Bhavin, “Capital Budgeting Practices in Indian Chemical Companies: A Survey”, IMS Manthan, 2006, Vol.1, Issue 2, October, pp 65-84. Firm size as a moderator of the relationship between business ...... 14 | Srusti Management Review Jan-June 2009 5. Hambrick, D.C., “Some tests of effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategic types” Academy of Management Journal, 1983, Vol.26, No.1, pp5-26. 6. Hofer C W, “Toward a contingency theory of Business strategy” Academy of Management Journal, 1975, Vol.18, pp 784-810. 7. Jennings D F, Daniel Rajaratnam, Lawrence F B , “Strategy- Performance Relationships in service firms: A test for equifinality”, Journal of Management Issues, 2003, Vol.XV, No.2, Summer, pp 208-220. ISBN 97860-9742114-7-3 8. John A Parnell, “Generic Strategy and Business Performance: an empirical test of the Miles and Snow Typology”, British Journal of Management, 1993, Vol.4, pp29-36. 9. Tamalee Kitima, Sulaiman Mohamed, and Ismail Ishak, “Business Strategy and Performance of Manufacturing Firms in Thailand”, Paper presented at conference organised by Oxford Business and Economics, UK, on June 22-24, 2008. 10. Manoj Anand, “Corporate Finance Practices in India: A Survey”, Vikalpa, 2002, Vol.27, No.4, October –December, pp29-56. 11.Namiki, N., (), Miles and Snow’s Typology of strategy, perceived environment uncer tainty and organizational performance, Akron Business and Economic Review, 1989, Vol. 20(2), 72-88 12.Parnell J A, “New Evidence in the Generic Strategy and Business Per formance Debate: A Research Note”, British Journal of Management, 1997, Vol.8, pp175-181. 13. Shaker A Zahra and John A Pearce II, “Research Evidence on the Miles – Snow typology”, Journal of Management, 1990, Vol.16, No.4, pp751-768. 14.Short C J, Ketchen J D Jr, T B Palmer, “Firm, Strategic Group, and Industry influences on Performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 2007, Vol. 28, pp 147-167. 15.Simon S M Ho, H Pike Richard , “Organisation characteristics influencing the use of risk analysis in strategic capital investments” The Engineering Economist, 1998,Vol.43, No.3, Spring, pp247-268. 16.Slater S F and Narver J C, “Product- Market Strategy and Performance: An analysis of the Miles and Snow Strategic Types”, European Journal of Marketing, 1993, Vol.27, pp 33-51. 17.Smith, K.G., Guthrie, J.P., & Chen, M.J., “Strategy, size and performance”, Organizational Studies, 1989, Vol. 10, No.1, pp63 – 81. 18.Thomas A.S., and Ramaswamy, K., “Matching managers to strategy: Further tests of Miles and snow’s typology”, British Journal of Management, 1996, Vol. 7, pp247 – 261. 19.Thomas, A.S., and Ramaswamy, K. , “Matching managers to strategy: An Investigation of Performance implications and boundary conditions”, Australian Journal of Management, 1994, Vol. 19, No.1, June, pp73 – 93. 20.Blumentritt Tim and M Danis Wade, “Business Strategy Types and Innovative Practices”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 2006, Vol. XVIII, No.2, summer, pp 274-291. |